What cost city living?
23 August 2007
Dear Sir
So "City Living" has brought millions
for green spaces from developers in the last 5 years (Star August
10). But at what cost ? Poorly designed, high rise buildings without
amenities and no sense of community. Minimum environmental building
standards that waste energy and increase tenants bills. Failure
to enforce social housing guidelines as waiting lists rocket.
"Buy to Let" absentee landlords and vacant apartments.
An increasing concensus that we are building the slums of the
future.
The Anglo Works redevelopment on Trippet Lane
is a good example of where power lies and the horrific consequences.
Forced by planners to retain the historic facade, developers have
responded by connecting the buildings with ugly and inappropriate
plastic and glass. Meanwhile West One, the original flagship apartment
development, is at the centre of the 24 hour youth drinking culture
spilling over from West Street. Residents find themselves fighting
numerous battles against extended club and liquor licences that
guarantee noise and anti social behaviour well into the early
hours.
City centres are meant to be lived in and many
European cities are successful examples of this. However, the
British epidemic of drunken, anti social behaviour brings danger,
noise and stress with planners and licensing authorities failing
to give adequate protection to residents. It's time for the council
to exert far more control over development in Sheffield. The Sheffield
Development Framework must dictate the highest building standards
and higher affordable housing quotas. The Planning Department
must insist on high quality designs in appropriate locations.
We must wrest back control from developers and stop "City
Living" from becoming a failed social experiment that damages
the city for decades to come.
Yours Sincerely
Eamonn Ward
Sheffield Green Party
|